找回密码
 注册
X系列官方授权正版
搜索
查看: 4082|回复: 25

New progress on the origin of life

  [复制链接]
发表于 2010-3-30 12:54:19 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
Origin of life: building an RNA world from simple chemicals
By John Timmer  | Last updated May 14, 2009 1:08 PM


Studying the origin of life is a real challenge. Any actual evidence of the specific chemicals involved has long since been destroyed, leaving researchers with a big gap to bridge between the chemistry of the early earth and the molecules that appear to be fundamental to life itself. Recent years have seen a number of discoveries about DNA's close chemical relative, RNA, that suggest it played a key role in early protolife, leading to a proposal that life started out in an RNA world. One of the problems with this concept, however, was the fact that chemists hadn't come up with a way to synthesize the basic building blocks of RNA using the chemicals that were likely to be present in the early earth. Now, by taking a systems chemistry approach, a team of researchers at the University of Manchester have neatly cleared that hurdle.

On the biology side of things, support for an RNA world has built steadily in the last couple of decades, as discoveries have shown that RNA, in addition to carrying genetic information, can catalyze a variety of chemical reactions and undergo a form of chemical evolution when placed under a selective pressure. Remnants of the RNA world also appear to be central to modern life. Key molecules such as ATP and NADH are derivatives of RNA components, and RNA appears to catalyze a key step in the production of proteins.

But, so far, chemistry had come up a bit short. An RNA molecule is basically a polymer of individual units comprised of a ring-shaped base molecule, a sugar, and a phosphate. Chemists had figured out different ways that simple organic chemicals that were likely to be present in the early earth could form the base and sugar (phosphates are abundant). But, so far, they'd failed to chemically link them together in a functional unit.

The new research, published in Nature, suggests the problem may have been the reductionist approach itself. In short, scientists had been taking a bit of a "we'll deal with that later" approach to the problem, synthesizing the individual components separately before trying to figure out how they could link up. Instead, the researchers found that, by having the phosphate present in the reactions from the start, they could build up a three-ringed structure that would then react with the phosphate. That reaction would split open one of the rings, with the remaining two linked rings forming the cytosine base and sugar, all hooked up to a reactive phosphate that could undergo polymerization into RNA.

To get there, the researchers took the simple organic chemicals that had been used to make a sugar and base in separate reactions: cyanamide, cyanoacetylene, glycolaldehyde, and glyceraldehyde. They then used a systems chemistry approach, exploring all the reactions that the chemicals could undergo. They came up with a simple, four-step synthesis that went through the three-ringed intermediate molecule. The key question was whether any of the reactions would actually take place under realistic conditions.

Building up a two-ringed intermediate had already been described in the literature, but the reaction only ran under very basic conditions, which would have destroyed one of the other reaction compounds. It turned out that adding phosphate at this step allowed it to catalyze the reaction at neutral pH, providing an 80 percent yield of a two-ringed chemical. The next step, a reaction with cyanoacetylene to form the final intermediate, would typically turn the reaction solution acidic, altering the products. Instead, the phosphate buffered the solution, keeping it near a neutral pH and fostering the production of the three-ringed compound. The phosphate also reacted with a reaction byproduct, ensuring that a reverse-reaction couldn't take place.

Finally, with a little bit of heat, the phosphate would react with the three ringed structure, forming a mature RNA base, and linking the phosphate in a reactive state that's suitable for polymerization into an RNA molecule. Although this is specific for the cytosine base, exposing it to UV converted some of it to uridine, the other base of this sort.

All in all, most of these reactions seem pretty reasonable. They do require some different temperatures, but temperature gradients aren't uncommon in nature. The big stumbling block seems to be the fact that the authors kept one of the chemicals out of the reaction mix until the third step of the synthesis. I'm curious to see what kind of yields they might get if they put all the reactants together at once. There are also two other nucleotides that need to be synthesized, so the chemists' job isn't done yet.

Still, it's difficult not to be extremely impressed by the work. Not only have the authors managed to devise a very straightforward synthesis process, but they've vastly simplified the conditions necessary for getting the reactions to take place. And it's not just me who's impressed; Jack Szostak, who conducts origin of life research, wrote that the work "will stand for years as one of the great advances in prebiotic chemistry," in an accompanying perspective.

Nature, 2009. DOI: 10.1038/nature08013

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册

×
发表于 2010-4-7 05:39:37 | 显示全部楼层
i can make life
by
fuking
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-4-5 12:24:12 | 显示全部楼层
回复 24# kanhf0514
Your translation is also wonderful,isn`t it?Let us promote this column together!
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-4-5 10:38:36 | 显示全部楼层
WOW~ We have great translation experts here, great job 尼奇怪
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-3-31 12:00:30 | 显示全部楼层
En……I think that your free translation is better to understand and more vivid.Mine is direct translation,which may be exact but hard to understand because of the differences between the two languages.I prefer the direct translation when translating a scientific article like this one.
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-3-31 11:34:59 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 sghost 于 2010-3-31 11:36 编辑

回复 17# 尼奇怪
"chemistry had come up a bit short"或许应该理解为“在化学方面(的研究)遇到瓶颈”?[S::P:]
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-3-31 00:07:53 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 尼奇怪 于 2010-3-31 00:18 编辑

All that I can say is "a professional is proffessional"……I may have other questions for you tommorow please see to it~
================================================
why am I the brother?I`m just a sophomore!
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2010-3-30 23:54:37 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 baiseniao 于 2010-3-30 23:56 编辑

回复 19# 尼奇怪
Good question.
1. 'Base molecule' means "底物分子". a term of organic chemistry.
2. I think reductionist approach means '还原论的方法', its a little tough here and you made a small mistake.
In short, scientists had been taking a bit of a "we'll deal with that later" approach to the problem, synthesizing the individual components separately before trying to figure out how they could link up. Instead, the researchers found that, by having the phosphate present in the reactions from the start, they could build up a three-ringed structure that would then react with the phosphate.
This is your translation:"简言之,科学家已经对问题取得了“即将解决”的进展,并在尝试弄清它们如何连接起来之前已分别合成了独立的部件。与此不同的是,研究人员通过在反应开始时就加入磷酸分子发现这些分子能够组成一个三环结构并接着和磷酸分子发生反应。“
But I think it would be better if you translate it like this: "简言之,科学家们过去采取了一种”这些事情以后再说“的方法,将构成RNA的分子分别进行合成,然后再考虑怎样把它们连接起来。而今天研究者们发现,让磷酸从一开始就参与整个反应可以在反应中获得一个能和磷酸分子反应的三环结构。”
The latter sentence point out the new method those reseachers used and thats why they succeed.
Although this is specific for the cytosine base, exposing it to UV converted some of it to uridine, the other base of this sort.
3. Although this is specific for the cytosine base, exposing it to UV converted some of it to uridine, the other base of this sort.
I think 'it' refers to the RNA molecure you have just synthesized.[S::P:]
That's my personal understanding, point out any mistakes you found.
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-3-30 23:26:05 | 显示全部楼层
In fact,I really have serveral questions to ask brother baiseniao(Is this text from your textbook?……
"reductionist approach"I`ve translate it into"还原论"according to my Lingose,but what`s it?
" ……that were likely to be present in the early earth could form the base and sugar ……"what`s the "base" mean?I`ve translate it into "模板",but I think it`s the main part of the RNA that the sugar and phosphate linked to.I can`t have it in Chinese……
"Although this is specific for the cytosine base, exposing it to UV converted some of it to uridine, the other base of this sort."what the first "it" refer to?the cytosine base?
I`ll thank you a lot~
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2010-3-30 23:16:43 | 显示全部楼层
Nice translation ya...
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

关闭

站长推荐上一条 /1 下一条

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|DeepTimes.NET 太空游戏站